top of page
Writer's pictureRob Chandler

The Real Impact of Flexible Virtual Production: A Response to NantStudios' DVS Announcement




The recent announcement of NantStudios' Dynamic Volume System marks what could be a pivotal moment in film production technology. Whilst the industry has been abuzz with various virtual production innovations, this development potentially addresses one of the most significant challenges we've faced in modern filmmaking.


For those of us who've spent years working with traditional LED volumes, the limitations have been painfully apparent. Every production must conform to the fixed architecture of these spaces, often resulting in compromised creative decisions. It's rather like forcing architects to design buildings only in perfect squares - technically feasible, but creatively stifling.


What makes NantStudios' approach particularly intriguing isn't merely the technology itself, but rather its implications for the broader industry. The concept of morphing LED volumes represents more than just technical innovation - it suggests a fundamental shift in how we might approach production planning and creative development.


Consider the current state of virtual production. Productions typically must choose between building a permanent LED volume (expensive and inflexible) or settling for a temporary installation (time-consuming and often compromised). The proposed Dynamic Volume System appears to offer a rather elegant solution to this dilemma, though one imagines the proof will be in the practical implementation.


The financial implications are particularly worth noting. Traditional virtual production has created something of a class divide in the industry - those who can afford permanent installations and those who cannot. A modular, adaptable system could democratise access to this technology, allowing smaller productions to benefit from virtual production capabilities without requiring massive capital investment.


However, several questions remain unanswered. The durability of moving parts in a high-intensity production environment, the speed of reconfiguration, and the impact on calibration and tracking systems will all need to be thoroughly tested. One hopes these considerations have been adequately addressed during development.


The environmental aspect shouldn't be overlooked either. The ability to reconfigure spaces rather than build new ones could significantly reduce the industry's carbon footprint - a crucial consideration in today's climate-conscious production landscape.


As we approach their January 2025 unveiling, it will be fascinating to see how this technology performs in real-world conditions. If it delivers on its promises, we might well be looking at the next significant evolution in production technology.


The true test, of course, will be in the hands of creative teams. Will this flexibility truly enhance storytelling capabilities? Will it enable new forms of visual expression? These questions remain to be answered, but the potential is undeniably intriguing.


These views reflect personal industry experience and technical analysis.


5 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page